<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<crossref_result xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0" version="3.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref_query_output3.0.xsd">
  <query_result>
    <head>
      <doi_batch_id>none</doi_batch_id>
    </head>
    <body>
      <query status="resolved">
        <doi type="journal_article">10.31254/phyto.2026.15104</doi>
        <crm-item name="publisher-name" type="string">BioMed Research Publishers</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="prefix-name" type="string">BioMed Research Publishers</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="member-id" type="number">16195</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citation-id" type="number">192875274</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="journal-id" type="number">316921</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="deposit-timestamp" type="number">20260407013135159</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="owner-prefix" type="string">10.31254</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="last-update" type="date">2026-04-07T01:31:36Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="created" type="date">2026-04-07T01:31:36Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citedby-count" type="number">0</crm-item>
        <doi_record>
          <crossref xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1 http://doi.crossref.org/schemas/unixref1.1.xsd">
            <journal>
              <journal_metadata>
                <full_title>The Journal of Phytopharmacology</full_title>
                <abbrev_title>J Phytopharmacol</abbrev_title>
                <issn media_type="electronic">2320480X</issn>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.31254/phyto</doi>
                  <resource>https://phytopharmajournal.com/</resource>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_metadata>
              <journal_issue>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>03</month>
                  <day>30</day>
                  <year>2026</year>
                </publication_date>
                <journal_volume>
                  <volume>15</volume>
                </journal_volume>
                <issue>1</issue>
              </journal_issue>
              <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
                <titles>
                  <title>GC-MS and FTIR guided phytochemical profiling and antioxidant activity evaluation of Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. bark extracts obtained via ultrasound-assisted extraction</title>
                </titles>
                <contributors>
                  <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Sheba</given_name>
                    <surname>Raju</surname>
                    <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7736-8408</ORCID>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Nishamol</given_name>
                    <surname>Kanat</surname>
                    <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3709-5508</ORCID>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Jonty</given_name>
                    <surname>Rodrigues</surname>
                    <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0877-0347</ORCID>
                  </person_name>
                </contributors>
                <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xml:lang="en">
                  <jats:p>Background: Plants have secondary metabolites, which can act as antioxidants to neutralize free radicals preventing oxidative stress related health issues. Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. an ethnomedicinal medicinal plant of the Rubiaceae family that has extensive pharmacological properties. Objective: To study the effect of different solvents on extraction yield, phytochemical content and antioxidant potential of M. parvifolia bark and to profile the major phytochemicals in the most bioactive extract. Materials and Methods: Bark was extracted using methanol, ethanol, aqueous and hydroethanol via the ultrasound-assisted extraction method. Total phenolic content (TPC) and flavonoid content (TFC) of extracts are determined by folin-ciocalteau and aluminium chloride method. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using DPPH and Nitric oxide scavenging (NOSA) assays. The metabolite profiling of the bioactive rich extract was performed using Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Results: Among the different solvent extracts of M. parvifolia bark, hydroethanolic extract (HEE) yielded maximum extraction efficiency (11.6 %) with the presence of phenols, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, terpenoids, glycosides, and steroids. HEE exhibited greater levels of TPC (120.78 ± 1.165 mg GAE/g) and TFC (76.89 ± 1.424 mg QE/g). In terms of antioxidant activity, HEE showed strongest DPPH and NOSA radical scavenging potential compared to other extracts with IC50 values of 114.27 ± 1.021 ug/mL and 123.47 ± 3.801ug/mL, respectively. The FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of alkanes, alkenes carboxylic and hydroxy groups indicating alcohols, phenols, terpenoids, alkaloids. GC-MS profiling of the HEE revealed the presence of 12 major bioactive phytochemicals, mainly 9-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester (60.67%), Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (10.41%), Squalene (1.96 %) and Pterin-6-carboxylic acid (1.25 %). Conclusion: The findings suggest that hydroethanol is the most effective solvent for extracting bioactive phytochemicals from M. parvifolia bark, supporting its traditional therapeutic relevance and potential as natural antioxidant source.</jats:p>
                </jats:abstract>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>03</month>
                  <day>30</day>
                  <year>2026</year>
                </publication_date>
                <pages>
                  <first_page>26</first_page>
                  <last_page>34</last_page>
                </pages>
                <crossmark>
                  <crossmark_version>1</crossmark_version>
                  <crossmark_policy>10.31254/biomed-crossmark-policy</crossmark_policy>
                  <crossmark_domains>
                    <crossmark_domain>
                      <domain>www.biomedresearch.org</domain>
                    </crossmark_domain>
                  </crossmark_domains>
                  <crossmark_domain_exclusive>false</crossmark_domain_exclusive>
                </crossmark>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.31254/phyto.2026.15104</doi>
                  <resource>https://phytopharmajournal.com/articles/abstracts/879/year=2026&amp;vol=15&amp;issue=1</resource>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_article>
            </journal>
          </crossref>
        </doi_record>
      </query>
    </body>
  </query_result>
</crossref_result>