<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<crossref_result xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0" version="3.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref_query_output3.0.xsd">
  <query_result>
    <head>
      <doi_batch_id>none</doi_batch_id>
    </head>
    <body>
      <query status="resolved">
        <doi type="journal_article">10.31254/phyto.2025.14508</doi>
        <crm-item name="publisher-name" type="string">BioMed Research Publishers</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="prefix-name" type="string">BioMed Research Publishers</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="member-id" type="number">16195</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citation-id" type="number">187186659</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="journal-id" type="number">316921</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="deposit-timestamp" type="number">20251216133144430</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="owner-prefix" type="string">10.31254</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="last-update" type="date">2025-12-16T13:31:49Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="created" type="date">2025-12-16T13:31:46Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citedby-count" type="number">0</crm-item>
        <doi_record>
          <crossref xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1 http://doi.crossref.org/schemas/unixref1.1.xsd">
            <journal>
              <journal_metadata>
                <full_title>The Journal of Phytopharmacology</full_title>
                <abbrev_title>J Phytopharmacol</abbrev_title>
                <issn media_type="electronic">2320480X</issn>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.31254/phyto</doi>
                  <resource>https://www.phytopharmajournal.com/</resource>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_metadata>
              <journal_issue>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>11</month>
                  <day>30</day>
                  <year>2025</year>
                </publication_date>
                <journal_volume>
                  <volume>14</volume>
                </journal_volume>
                <issue>5</issue>
              </journal_issue>
              <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
                <titles>
                  <title>Anti-inflammatory activity of Urtica dioica root and Ganoderma lucidum in Swiss albino mice</title>
                </titles>
                <contributors>
                  <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Siangu Belinda</given_name>
                    <surname>Nasike</surname>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Gembo Robert</given_name>
                    <surname>Ouko</surname>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Mwonjoria Kingori</given_name>
                    <surname>John</surname>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Njue Wilson</given_name>
                    <surname>Mbiti</surname>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Swaleh</given_name>
                    <surname>Sauda</surname>
                  </person_name>
                </contributors>
                <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xml:lang="en">
                  <jats:p>Background: Inflammatory response, a beneficial body's response to injury and infection, can have various detrimental effects, ranging from pain, edema, and fever. There are several modern remedies to these ailments, which include the use of Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) drugs as well as steroids. These treatments are associated with various adverse effects such as gastrointestinal irritation, liver and kidney toxicity, cardiovascular risks, and immunosuppression. Other methods of treatment in East Africa include the use of plant remedies such as Urtica dioica root and Ganoderma lucidum, though their efficacy has not been scientifically evaluated. Objective: This study aimed to assess the anti-inflammatory effects of methanol extracts of Urtica dioica root and Ganoderma lucidum using an animal model. Materials and methods: Formalin-induced hind paw edema in mice was used as the model of acute inflammation. The animals were administered with 12.5, 25 &amp; 50 mg doses of the two plants 30 minutes prior to injection of 5% formalin solution in the left hind paw. Paw diameter was taken before injection of formalin and every hour after for three hours using digital Vernier callipers. The difference between the initial reading and subsequent readings was quantified as edema formed in the hind paw. Qualitative phytochemical analyses were carried out using standard methods. The data obtained was expressed as means and their standard errors, then analysed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey as the post hoc test. A value of p &lt; 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The two extracts significantly reduced (p &lt; 0.05) the paw edema diameter. Phytochemical analyses identified secondary metabolites that can be associated with anti-inflammatory effects. Conclusion: These findings suggest that Urtica dioica root and Ganoderma lucidum may possess compounds with anti-inflammatory effects, hence supporting their folklore use for inflammation management.</jats:p>
                </jats:abstract>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>11</month>
                  <day>30</day>
                  <year>2025</year>
                </publication_date>
                <pages>
                  <first_page>352</first_page>
                  <last_page>356</last_page>
                </pages>
                <crossmark>
                  <crossmark_version>1</crossmark_version>
                  <crossmark_policy>10.31254/biomed-crossmark-policy</crossmark_policy>
                  <crossmark_domains>
                    <crossmark_domain>
                      <domain>www.biomedresearch.org</domain>
                    </crossmark_domain>
                  </crossmark_domains>
                  <crossmark_domain_exclusive>false</crossmark_domain_exclusive>
                </crossmark>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.31254/phyto.2025.14508</doi>
                  <resource>https://phytopharmajournal.com/articles/abstracts/842/year=2025&amp;vol=14&amp;issue=5</resource>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_article>
            </journal>
          </crossref>
        </doi_record>
      </query>
    </body>
  </query_result>
</crossref_result>