<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<crossref_result xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0" version="3.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref_query_output3.0.xsd">
  <query_result>
    <head>
      <doi_batch_id>none</doi_batch_id>
    </head>
    <body>
      <query status="resolved">
        <doi type="journal_article">10.31254/phyto.2025.14109</doi>
        <crm-item name="publisher-name" type="string">BioMed Research Publishers</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="prefix-name" type="string">BioMed Research Publishers</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="member-id" type="number">16195</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citation-id" type="number">174147565</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="journal-id" type="number">316921</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="deposit-timestamp" type="number">20250327162658435</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="owner-prefix" type="string">10.31254</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="last-update" type="date">2025-03-27T16:27:25Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="created" type="date">2025-03-27T16:27:19Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citedby-count" type="number">2</crm-item>
        <doi_record>
          <crossref xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1 http://doi.crossref.org/schemas/unixref1.1.xsd">
            <journal>
              <journal_metadata>
                <full_title>The Journal of Phytopharmacology</full_title>
                <abbrev_title>J Phytopharmacol</abbrev_title>
                <issn media_type="electronic">2320480X</issn>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.31254/phyto</doi>
                  <resource>https://phytopharmajournal.com/</resource>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_metadata>
              <journal_issue>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>3</month>
                  <day>23</day>
                  <year>2025</year>
                </publication_date>
                <journal_volume>
                  <volume>14</volume>
                </journal_volume>
                <issue>1</issue>
              </journal_issue>
              <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
                <titles>
                  <title>A review on comparative studies of phytochemical evaluation and pharmacological activities of Calotropis species: Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea</title>
                </titles>
                <contributors>
                  <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Ramesh Chandra</given_name>
                    <surname>Sharma</surname>
                    <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8832-8219</ORCID>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Anupam Singha</given_name>
                    <surname>Roy</surname>
                    <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-272X</ORCID>
                  </person_name>
                </contributors>
                <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xml:lang="en">
                  <jats:p>The genus Calotropis possesses two species Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea. Both species, stand out as important therapeutic plants because of the abundance of phytochemicals they contain, such as steroids and alkaloids, saponins glycosides, flavonoids, triterpenes, and anthraquinones. The various components found in different parts of both species contribute to their efficacy in treating a broad spectrum of health concerns, such as helminthic infections, diabetes, diarrhoea, malaria, inflammation, sterility, spasmodic disorders, cancer risks, and a variety of skin illnesses. This review critically examines and compares the phytochemical profiles and pharmacological activities of these two species, providing insights into their specific medicinal applications and efficacy. By consolidating current research, this review aims to guide future pharmacological studies and the development of herbal formulations based on Calotropis species.</jats:p>
                </jats:abstract>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>3</month>
                  <day>23</day>
                  <year>2025</year>
                </publication_date>
                <pages>
                  <first_page>62</first_page>
                  <last_page>69</last_page>
                </pages>
                <crossmark>
                  <crossmark_version>1</crossmark_version>
                  <crossmark_policy>10.31254/biomed-crossmark-policy</crossmark_policy>
                  <crossmark_domains>
                    <crossmark_domain>
                      <domain>www.biomedresearch.org</domain>
                    </crossmark_domain>
                  </crossmark_domains>
                  <crossmark_domain_exclusive>false</crossmark_domain_exclusive>
                </crossmark>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.31254/phyto.2025.14109</doi>
                  <resource>https://phytopharmajournal.com/articles/abstracts/805/year=2025&amp;vol=14&amp;issue=1</resource>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_article>
            </journal>
          </crossref>
        </doi_record>
      </query>
    </body>
  </query_result>
</crossref_result>