<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<crossref_result xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0" version="3.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref_query_output3.0.xsd">
  <query_result>
    <head>
      <doi_batch_id>none</doi_batch_id>
    </head>
    <body>
      <query status="resolved">
        <doi type="journal_article">10.31254/phyto.2023.12604</doi>
        <crm-item name="publisher-name" type="string">BioMed Research Publishers</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="prefix-name" type="string">BioMed Research Publishers</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="member-id" type="number">16195</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citation-id" type="number">156816268</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="journal-id" type="number">316921</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="deposit-timestamp" type="number">20240106024053043</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="owner-prefix" type="string">10.31254</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="last-update" type="date">2024-01-06T07:41:17Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="created" type="date">2024-01-06T07:41:08Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citedby-count" type="number">1</crm-item>
        <doi_record>
          <crossref xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1 http://doi.crossref.org/schemas/unixref1.1.xsd">
            <journal>
              <journal_metadata>
                <full_title>The Journal of Phytopharmacology</full_title>
                <abbrev_title>J Phytopharmacol</abbrev_title>
                <issn media_type="electronic">2320480X</issn>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.31254/phyto</doi>
                  <resource>https://www.phytopharmajournal.com/</resource>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_metadata>
              <journal_issue>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>12</month>
                  <day>30</day>
                  <year>2023</year>
                </publication_date>
                <journal_volume>
                  <volume>12</volume>
                </journal_volume>
                <issue>6</issue>
              </journal_issue>
              <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
                <titles>
                  <title>Varietal level comparison of Moringa oleifera Lam. for phytochemical constituents and antifungal properties against Fusarium oxysporum and Albugo candida</title>
                </titles>
                <contributors>
                  <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Sonali</given_name>
                    <surname>Yadav</surname>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Jyoti</given_name>
                    <surname>Mathur</surname>
                  </person_name>
                </contributors>
                <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xml:lang="en">
                  <jats:p>Background: The main objective of this work was to examine the chemical components, antioxidant and antifungal activities of an ethanolic extract of three Moringa oleifera varieties (PKM-1, PKM-2, and ODC-3) against selected fungal strains. The ethanolic extract was prepared using the Soxhlet extraction method. The extracts of three different varieties were tested for antioxidant activity as well as antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum and Albugo candida using the disc diffusion method, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined using the micro dilution method. Using the FTIR technique, spectrophotometer equipment was used to identify the distinctive peak values and functional groups. HPLC and GCMS were used to determine the phytochemical profiles of the three variants. Results: The preliminary phytochemical investigation revealed the presence of numerous secondary metabolites in all three M. oleifera types. The PKM-1 cultivar had a considerably higher total phenolic content (99.93 ± 0.239 mg GAE /g) than the PKM-2 and ODC-3 varieties of M. oleifera (81.58 ± 0.369 and 91.73 ± 0.254 mg GAE/g). The flavonoid content of the PKM-1 variety (135.3 ± 0.494 mg QE/g) was maximum than that of the PKM-2 and ODC-3 varieties (106.9 ± 0.553 and 117.1 ± 0.413 mg QE/g). In the DPPH and H2O2 assays, the PKM-1 variant was the most potent inhibitor (IC50) compared to the other two varieties. Antifungal activity testing demonstrated that all the three varieties suppress the growth of both the fungal strains such as F. oxysporum and A. candida with a mean zone of inhibition. FTIR examination of ethanol extract of Moringa types (PKM-1, PKM-2 and ODC-3) revealed the presence of distinct functional chemical classes at a variety of characteristic bands. GCMS analysis confirmed the presence of 25 metabolites in M. oleifera PKM-1 and 23 compounds in PKM-2 varieties. Conclusion: The results showed that M. oleifera has a diverse set of phytoconstituents with considerable antioxidant and antifungal effects, confirming its applicability in a wide range of applications.</jats:p>
                </jats:abstract>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>12</month>
                  <day>30</day>
                  <year>2023</year>
                </publication_date>
                <pages>
                  <first_page>377</first_page>
                  <last_page>391</last_page>
                </pages>
                <crossmark>
                  <crossmark_version>1</crossmark_version>
                  <crossmark_policy>10.31254/biomed-crossmark-policy</crossmark_policy>
                  <crossmark_domains>
                    <crossmark_domain>
                      <domain>www.biomedresearch.org</domain>
                    </crossmark_domain>
                  </crossmark_domains>
                  <crossmark_domain_exclusive>false</crossmark_domain_exclusive>
                </crossmark>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.31254/phyto.2023.12604</doi>
                  <resource>https://phytopharmajournal.com/assets/pdf_files/Vol12_Issue6_04.pdf</resource>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_article>
            </journal>
          </crossref>
        </doi_record>
      </query>
    </body>
  </query_result>
</crossref_result>