<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_records>
  <doi_record owner="10.5194" timestamp="2025-02-15 01:36:28">
    <crossref>
      <journal>
        <journal_metadata language="en" reference_distribution_opts="any">
          <full_title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</full_title>
          <abbrev_title>Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev_title>
          <issn media_type="electronic">1867-8548</issn>
        </journal_metadata>
        <journal_issue>
          <publication_date media_type="online">
            <year>2014</year>
          </publication_date>
          <journal_volume>
            <volume>7</volume>
          </journal_volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
        </journal_issue>
        <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
          <titles>
            <title>
              Net ecosystem CO
              <sub>2</sub>
              exchange measurements by the closed chamber method and the eddy covariance technique and their dependence on atmospheric conditions
            </title>
          </titles>
          <contributors>
            <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
              <given_name>M.</given_name>
              <surname>Riederer</surname>
            </person_name>
            <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
              <given_name>A.</given_name>
              <surname>Serafimovich</surname>
              <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-6073</ORCID>
            </person_name>
            <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
              <given_name>T.</given_name>
              <surname>Foken</surname>
              <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4562-9083</ORCID>
            </person_name>
          </contributors>
          <abstract>
            <p><![CDATA[Abstract. Carbon dioxide flux measurements in ecosystem sciences are mostly conducted by eddy covariance technique or the closed chamber method. But there is a lack of detailed comparisons that assess present differences and uncertainties. To determine underlying processes, a 10-day, side-by-side measurement of the net ecosystem exchange with both techniques was evaluated with regard to various atmospheric conditions during the diurnal cycle. It was found that, depending on the particular atmospheric condition, the chamber carbon dioxide flux was either (i) equal to the carbon dioxide flux measured by the reference method eddy covariance, by day with well-developed atmospheric turbulence; (ii) higher, in the afternoon in times of oasis effect; (iii) lower, predominantly at night while large coherent structure fluxes or high wind velocities prevailed; or (iv) showed less variation in the flux pattern, at night while stable stratification was present. At night – when respiration forms the net ecosystem exchange – lower chamber carbon dioxide fluxes were found. In the afternoon – when the ecosystem is still a net carbon sink – the carbon dioxide fluxes measured by the chamber prevailed. These two complementary aspects resulted in an overestimation of the ecosystem sink capacity by the chamber of 40% in this study.]]></p>
          </abstract>
          <publication_date media_type="online">
            <month>04</month>
            <day>25</day>
            <year>2014</year>
          </publication_date>
          <pages>
            <first_page>1057</first_page>
            <last_page>1064</last_page>
          </pages>
          <program name="AccessIndicators">
            <free_to_read start_date="2014-04-25" />
            <license_ref applies_to="vor" start_date="2014-04-25">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</license_ref>
          </program>
          <program name="relations">
            <related_item>
              <intra_work_relation relationship-type="hasPreprint" identifier-type="doi">10.5194/amtd-6-8783-2013</intra_work_relation>
            </related_item>
          </program>
          <doi_data>
            <doi>10.5194/amt-7-1057-2014</doi>
            <resource>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/7/1057/2014/</resource>
            <collection property="crawler-based">
              <item crawler="iParadigms">
                <resource>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/7/1057/2014/amt-7-1057-2014.pdf</resource>
              </item>
            </collection>
          </doi_data>
          <citation_list>
            <citation key="ref1">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy Covariance, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2012.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref2">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Baldocchi, D. D.: Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future, Global Change Biol., 9, 479–492, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x, 2003.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref3">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/BF00707033</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Collineau, S. and Brunet, Y.: Detection of turbulent coherent motions in a forest canopy part I: Wavelet analysis, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 65, 357–379, 1993.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref4">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4940701.x</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Conen, F. and Smith, K. A.: A re-examination of closed flux chamber methods for the measurement of trace gas emissions from soils to the atmosphere, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 49, 701–707, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.4940701.x, 1998.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref5">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00100-4</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Davidson, E. A., Savage, K., Verchot, L. V., and Navarro, R.: Minimizing artefacts and biases in chamber-based measurements of soil respiration: FLUXNET 2000 Synthesis, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 113, 21–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00100-4, 2002.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref6">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/s11104-008-9599-z</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Denmead, O. T.: Approaches to measuring fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide between landscapes and the atmosphere, Plant Soil, 309, 5–24, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9599-z, 2008.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref7">
              <unstructured_citation>Denmead, O. T. and Reicosky, D.: Tillage-induced gas fluxes: comparison of meteorological and large chamber techniques, In: Proceedings of the International Soil Tillage Research Organization 2003 conference, Brisbane, Australia, 13–18 July, 2003.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref8">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/BF02166801</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Desjardins, R. L.: Description and evaluation of a sensible heat flux detector, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 11, 147–154, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02166801, 1977.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref9">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00561.x</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Dore, S., Hymus, G. J., Johnson, D. P., Hinkle, C. R., Valentini, R., and Drake, B. G.: Cross validation of open–top chamber and eddy covariance measurements of ecosystem CO2 exchange in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem, Global Change Biol., 9, 84–95, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00561.x, 2003.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref10">
              <unstructured_citation>Foken, T.: Micrometeorology, Springer, Berlin, 2008.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref11">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surface based flux measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 78, 83–105, 1996.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref12">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/1-4020-2265-4_9</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Foken, T., Göckede, M., Mauder, M., Mahrt, L., Amiro, B. D., and Munger, J. W.: Post-field data quality control, in: Handbook of micrometeorology: A guide for surface flux measurement and analysis, edited by: Lee, X., Massman, W., and Law B., Kluwer, Dordrecht, 181–208, 2004.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref13">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_1</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Foken, T., Aubinet, M., and Leuning, R.: The eddy-covariance method, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 1–19, 2012a.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref14">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_4</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Foken, T., Leuning, R., Oncley, S. P., Mauder, M., and Aubinet, M.: Corrections and data quality, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 85–131, 2012b.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref15">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.5194/acp-12-1923-2012</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Foken, T., Meixner, F. X., Falge, E., Zetzsch, C., Serafimovich, A., Bargsten, A., Behrendt, T., Biermann, T., Breuninger, C., Dix, S., Gerken, T., Hunner, M., Lehmann-Pape, L., Hens, K., Jocher, G., Kesselmeier, J., Lüers, J., Mayer, J.-C., Moravek, A., Plake, D., Riederer, M., Rütz, F., Scheibe, M., Siebicke, L., Sörgel, M., Staudt, K., Trebs, I., Tsokankunku, A., Welling, M., Wolff, V., and Zhu, Z.: Coupling processes and exchange of energy and reactive and non-reactive trace gases at a forest site – results of the EGER experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1923–1950, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1923-2012, 2012c.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref16">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1029/2007GB003027</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Fox, A. M., Huntley, B., Lloyd, C. R., Williams, M., and Baxter, R.: Net ecosystem exchange over heterogeneous Arctic tundra: Scaling between chamber and eddy covariance measurements, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB2027, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003027, 2008.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref17">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/978-94-009-0975-5_22</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Gao, W., Shaw, R. H., and Paw U, K. T.: Observation of organized structure in turbulent flow within and above a forest canopy, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 47, 349–377, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122339, 1989.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref18">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.07.012</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Göckede, M., Rebmann, C., and Foken, T.: A combination of quality assessment tools for eddy covariance measurements with footprint modelling for the characterisation of complex sites: Flux and concentration footprints, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 127, 175–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.07.012, 2004.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref19">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/s10546-005-6435-3</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Göckede, M., Markkanen, T., Hasager, C. B., and Foken, T.: Update of a footprint-based approach for the characterization of complex measurement sites, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 118, 635–655, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-6435-3, 2006.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref20">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Goulden, M. L., Munger, J. W., Fan, S.-M., Daube, B. C., and Wofsy, S.: Measurements of carbon sequestration by long–term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy, Glob. Change Biol., 2, 169–182, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x, 1996.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref21">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1017/CBO9780511919701</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L., Berkooz, G., and Rowley, C. W.: Turbulence, coherent structures, dynamical systems and symmetry, 2nd Edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, 386 pp., 2012.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref22">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00177-5</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Janssens, I. A., Kowalski, A. S., and Ceulemans, R.: Forest floor CO2 fluxes estimated by eddy covariance and chamber–based model, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 106, 61–69, 2001.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref23">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1029/2007JD009149</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Karipot, A., Leclerc, M. Y., Zhang, G., Lewin, K. F., Nagy, J., Hendrey, G. R., and Starr, D.: Influence of nocturnal low-level jet on turbulence structure and CO2 flux measurements over a forest canopy, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D10102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009149, 2008.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref24">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.2136/sssaj1971.03615995003500010013x</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Kimball, B. and Lemon, E. R.: Air Turbulence Effects upon Soil Gas Exchange, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 35, 16–21, 1971.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref25">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/0002-1571(71)90020-3</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Kimball, B. and Lemon, E. R.: Theory of soil air movement due to pressure fluctuations, Agric. Meteorol., 9, 163–181, 1972.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref26">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Kutzbach, L., Schneider, J., Sachs, T., Giebels, M., Nykänen, H., Shurpali, N. J., Martikainen, P. J., Alm, J., and Wilmking, M.: CO2 flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression, Biogeosciences, 4, 1005–1025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007, 2007.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref27">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.5194/bg-9-3305-2012</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Lai, D. Y. F., Roulet, N. T., Humphreys, E. R., Moore, T. R., and Dalva, M.: The effect of atmospheric turbulence and chamber deployment period on autochamber CO2 and CH4 flux measurements in an ombrotrophic peatland, Biogeosciences, 9, 3305–3322, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3305-2012, 2012.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref28">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.05.005</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Laine, A., Sottocornola, M., Kiely, G., Byrne, K. A., Wilson, D., and Tuittila, E.-S.: Estimating net ecosystem exchange in a patterned ecosystem: Example from blanket bog, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 138, 231–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.05.005, 2006.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref29">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/1-4020-2265-4</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Lee, X., Massman, W. J., and Law, B. (Eds.): Handbook of Micrometeorology: A Guide for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 250 pp., 2004.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref30">
              <unstructured_citation>LI-COR: LI-8100 Instruction Manual, LI-8100 automated soil CO2 flux system, LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA 68504, 2004.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref31">
              <unstructured_citation>Mauder, M. and Foken, T.: Documentation and instruction manual of the eddy covariance software package TK2, Univ. Bayreuth, Abt. Mikrometeorol., ISSN: 1614-89166, 26, 42 pp., 2004.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref32">
              <unstructured_citation>Mauder, M. and Foken, T.: Documentation and instruction manual of the eddy covariance software package TK3, Univ. Bayreuth, Abt. Mikrometeorol., ISSN: 1614-89166, 46, 58 pp., 2011.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref33">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.5194/bg-5-451-2008</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Mauder, M., Foken, T., Clement, R., Elbers, J. A., Eugster, W., Grünwald, T., Heusinkveld, B., and Kolle, O.: Quality control of CarboEurope flux data – Part 2: Inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software, Biogeosciences, 5, 451–462, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-451-2008, 2008.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref34">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1093/jxb/48.5.1133</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Moncrieff, J., Valentini, R., Greco S., Seufert, G., and Ciccioli P.: Trace gas exchange over terrestrial ecosystems: Methods and perspectives in micrometeorology, J. Exp. Bot., 48, 1133–1142, 1997.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref35">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1175/1520-0469(1948)005&lt;0265:VEFOHI&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Montgomery R. B.: Vertical eddy flux of heat in the atmosphere, J. Meteorol., 5, 265–274, 1948.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref36">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.06.016</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Myklebust, M., Hipps, L., and Ryel, R.: Comparison of eddy covariance, chamber, and gradient methods of measuring soil CO2 efflux in an annual semi-arid grass, Bromus tectorum, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 148, 1894–1907, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.06.016, 2008.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref37">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1029/97JD01440</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Norman, J. M., Kucharik, C. J., Gower, S. T., Baldocchi, D. D., Crill, P. M., Rayment, M., Savage, K., and Striegl, R. G.: A comparison of six methods for measuring soil–surface carbon dioxide fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28771–28777, 1997.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref38">
              <unstructured_citation>Obukhov, A. M.: Charakteristiki mikrostruktury vetra v prizemnom sloje atmosfery (Characteristics of the micro-structure of the wind in the surface layer of the atmosphere), Izv AN SSSR, ser Geofiz., 3, 49–68, 1951.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref39">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.12.001</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Pumpanen, J., Kolari, P., Ilvesniemi, H., Minkkinen, K., Vesala, T., Niinistö, S., Lohila, A., Larmola, T., Morero, M., Pihlatie, M., Janssens, I., Yuste, J. C., Grünzweig, J. M., Reth, S., Subke, J.-A., Savage, K., Kutsch, W., Østreng, G., Ziegler, W., Anthoni, P., Lindroth, A., and Hari, P.: Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil CO2 efflux, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 123, 159–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.12.001, 2004.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref40">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1023/A:1002702810929</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Rannik, Ü., Aubinet, M., Kurbanmuradov, O., Sabelfeld, K. K., Markkanen, T., and Vesala, T.: Footprint analysis for measurements over a heterogeneous forest, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 97, 137–166, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002702810929, 2000.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref41">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_8</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Rannik, Ü., Sogachev, A., Foken, T., Göckede, M., Kljun, N., Leclerc, M. Y., and Vesala, T.: Footprint Analysis, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 211–261, 2012.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref42">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/s00704-004-0094-z</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Reth, S., Göckede, M., and Falge, E.: CO2 efflux from agricultural soils in Eastern Germany – comparison of a closed chamber system with eddy covariance measurements, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 80, 105–120, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-004-0094-z, 2005.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref43">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.2134/agronmonogr47.c12</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Rochette, P. and Hutchinson, G. L.: Measurement of Soil Respiration in situ: Chamber Techniques, in: Micrometeorology in agricultural systems, edited by: Hatfield, J. L. and Baker, J. M., American Society of Agronomy; Crop Science Society of America; Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, 247–287, 2005.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref44">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/s10546-011-9619-z</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Serafimovich, A., Thomas, C., and Foken, T.: Vertical and Horizontal Transport of Energy and Matter by Coherent Motions in a Tall Spruce Canopy, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 140, 429–451, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9619-z, 2011.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref45">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Stull, R. B.: An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, xii, 666, 1988.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref46">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.06.007</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Subke, J.-A. and Tenhunen, J. D.: Direct measurements of CO2 flux below a spruce forest canopy, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 126, 157–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.06.007, 2004.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref47">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1175/1520-0469(1951)008&lt;0135:TMOVTO&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Swinbank W. C.: The measurement of vertical transfer of heat and water vapor by eddies in the lower atmosphere, J. Meteorol., 8, 135–145, 1951.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref48">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/s00704-004-0093-0</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Thomas, C. and Foken, T.: Detection of long–term coherent exchange over spruce forest using wavelet analysis, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 80, 91–104, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-004-0093-0, 2005.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref49">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/s10546-006-9144-7</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Thomas, C. and Foken, T.: Flux contribution of coherent structures and its implications for the exchange of energy and matter in a tall spruce canopy, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 123, 317–337, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9144-7, 2007.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref50">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00252.x</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>van Gorsel, E., Leuning, R., Cleugh, H. A., Keith, H., and Suni, T.: Nocturnal carbon efflux: reconciliation of eddy covariance and chamber measurements using an alternative to the u* – threshold filtering technique, Tellus B, 59, 397–403, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00252.x, 2007.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref51">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014&lt;0512:QCAFSP&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Vickers, D. and Mahrt, L.: Quality control and flux sampling problems for tower and aircraft data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 14, 512–526, 1997.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref52">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.5194/bg-10-6865-2013</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Wang, K., Liu, C., Zheng, X., Pihlatie, M., Li, B., Haapanala, S., Vesala, T., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Liu, G., and Hu, F.: Comparison between eddy covariance and automatic chamber techniques for measuring net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in cotton and wheat fields, Biogeosciences, 10, 6865–6877, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6865-2013, 2013.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref53">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1093/treephys/tpp098</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Wang, M., Guan, D.-X., Han, S.-J., and Wu, J.-L.: Comparison of eddy covariance and chamber-based methods for measuring CO2 flux in a temperate mixed forest, Tree Physiol., 30, 149–163, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp098, 2009.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref54">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1364/AO.40.000846</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Werle, P. and Kormann, R.: Fast Chemical Sensor for Eddy-Correlation Measurements of Methane Emissions from Rice Paddy Fields, Appl. Optics, 40, 846–858, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.000846, 2001.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref55">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_13</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Wohlfahrt, G., Klumpp K., and Soussana, J. F.: Eddy covariance measurements over grasslands, in: Eddy Covariance: A practical guide to measurement and data analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 333–344, 2012.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
            <citation key="ref56">
              <doi provider="crossref">10.1029/2005JD006435</doi>
              <unstructured_citation>Xu, L., Furtaw, M. D., Madsen, R. A., Garcia, R. L., Anderson, D. J., and McDermitt, D. K.: On maintaining pressure equilibrium between a soil CO2 flux chamber and the ambient air, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D08S10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006435, 2006.</unstructured_citation>
            </citation>
          </citation_list>
        </journal_article>
      </journal>
    </crossref>
  </doi_record>
</doi_records>