EURO Journal on Decision Processes EURO Journal on Decision Processes 21939438 11 2019 7 3-4 Kristan Cockerill https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-2413 Pierre Glynn Ilan Chabay Mahmud Farooque RaimoP. Hämäläinen Ben Miyamoto Patricia McKay 11 2019 243 265 S2193943821001072 S2193943821001072 10.1016/elsevier_cm_policy elsevier.com sciencedirect.com true Elsevier Records of engagement and decision making for environmental and socio-ecological challenges EURO Journal on Decision Processes https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-019-00104-6 article Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Association of European Operational Research Societies (EURO). Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved. https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ https://www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license 10.1007/s40070-019-00104-6 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2193943821001072 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40070-019-00104-6.pdf http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40070-019-00104-6.pdf http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40070-019-00104-6/fulltext.html https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2193943821001072?httpAccept=text/xml https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2193943821001072?httpAccept=text/plain https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/ AIP J Arnstein 35 4 216 1969 A ladder of citizen participation Auto Robot Bajcsy 42 177 2018 10.1007/s10514-017-9615-3 Revisiting active perception Becker E (2012) Social-ecological systems as epistemic objects. In: Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter BM, Welp M (eds) Human–nature interactions in the anthropocene: potentials of social-ecological systems analysis, chapter 3. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 37–59 Sustain Sci Bednarek 13 1175 2018 10.1007/s11625-018-0550-9 Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives Belt 2004 Mediated modeling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Sci Commun Boix Mansilla 41 4 571 2016 Shared cognitive—emotional—interactional platforms markers and conditions for successful interdisciplinary collaborations 10.5040/9780755694716.0001 Bowles N, Hamilton JT, Levy DAL (2014) Introduction. In: Bowles N, Hamilton JT, Levy DAL (eds) Transparency in politics and the media. Reuters Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, pp xi–xxiii 10.2139/ssrn.372280 Cash D, Clark WC, Alcock F et al (2003a) Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/32067415/Salience_credibility.pdf?sequence=4. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA Cash 100 8086 2003 10.1073/pnas.1231332100 Knowledge systems for sustainable development Evol Inst Econ Rev Chabay 2019 Vision, identity, and collective behavior change on pathways to sustainable futures Ida Law Rev Chaffin 51 157 2015 Resilience, adaptation, and transformation in the Klamath River Basin social-ecological system Environ Sci Policy Chaffin 57 112 2016 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.008 Institutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin, USA 10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_6 Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Craig RK (2018) The emergence of adaptive governance in the Klamath River Basin. In: Cosens B, Gunderson LH (eds) Practical panarchy for adaptive water governance linking law to social-ecological resilience. Springer, Berlin, pp 83–98 Churchman 1968 The systems approach Churchman 1979 The systems approach and its enemies Environ Pract Cockerill 12 127 2010 10.1017/S1466046610000104 Cooperative modeling to promote systems thinking in applying the National Environmental Policy Act Environ Pract Cockerill 9 28 2007 10.1017/S1466046607070032 Cooperative modeling lessons for environmental management Policy Sci Cockerill 42 211 2009 10.1007/s11077-009-9080-8 A fresh look at a policy sciences methodology: collaborative modeling for more effective policy Cockerill 2017 Environmental realism: challenging solutions Ecol Soc Colding 24 1 2 2019 10.5751/ES-10598-240102 Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later J Polym Cook 72 2 397 2010 Trusting what you know: information, knowledge and confidence in Social Security Environ Sci Policy Cornell 28 60 2013 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008 Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change Emot Rev D’Mello 10 2 174 2018 10.1177/1754073917696583 The affective computing approach to affect measurement Scand Pol Stud de Fine Licht 34 3 183 2011 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2011.00268.x Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy Doremus 2008 Water war in the Klamath Basin: Macho law, combat biology, and dirty politics Glob Environ Chang Duit 20 363 2010 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006 Governance, complexity, and resilience J Political Philos Etzioni 18 4 389 2010 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00366.x Is transparency the best disinfectant? Flint-Advisory-Task-Force (2016) Flint water advisory task force final report. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/snyder/FWATF_FINAL_REPORT_21March2016_517805_7.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 10.7312/flor14158 Florini A (ed) (2007) The right to know: transparency for an open world. Columbia University Press, New York 10.1057/978-1-137-53551-1_1 Franco LA, Hämäläinen RP (2016a) Engaging with behavioural OR: on methods, actors, and praxis. In: Kunc M, Malpass J, White L (eds) Behavioral operational research: theory, methodology and practice. Palgrave, London, pp 3–25 Eur J Oper Res Franco 249 791 2016 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.034 Behavioural operational research: returning to the roots of the OR profession Eur J Oper Res Franco 205 489 2010 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.030 Facilitated modelling in operational research Futures Funtowicz 25 7 739 1993 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L Science for the post-normal age 10.1109/WACV.2016.7477448 Ghasemi A, Denman S, Sridharan S, Fookes C (2016) Discovery of facial motions using deep machine perception. In: 2016 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV), 7–10 March 2016, Lake Placid, NY. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/7469250/proceeding. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Gaia Glaser 17 1 77 2008 10.14512/gaia.17.1.18 Human-nature-interaction in the Anthropocene. Potential of social-ecological systems analysis Glaser 2012 Human-nature-interaction in the Anthropocene. Potential of social-ecological systems analysis Glynn PD (2014) W(h)ither the Oracle? Cognitive biases and other human challenges of integrated environmental modeling. In: Ames DP, Quinn NWT, Rizzoli AE (eds) 7th International congress on environment modelling and software. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, San Diego, p 8. http://former.iemss.org/sites/iemss2014/. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Glynn PD (2017) Integrated environmental modelling: human decisions, human challenges. In: Riddick AT, Kessler H, Giles JRA (eds) Integrated environmental modelling to solve real world problems: methods, vision and challenges. Geological Society of London, London Earths Future Glynn 2017 10.1002/2016EF000487 From data to decisions: processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments IEEE Int Symp Technol Soc Proc Glynn 2018 Records of engagement and decision tracking for adaptive management and policy development Earths Future Glynn 6 762 2018 10.1002/2018EF000819 Response to comment by Walker et al. on “From data to decisions: processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments” Gregory 2012 Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices Public Admin Rev Grimmelikhuijsen 73 4 575 2013 10.1111/puar.12047 The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment Environ Model Softw Hämäläinen 73 244 2015 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.019 Behavioural issues in environmental modelling—the missing perspective Syst Res Behav Sci Hämäläinen 25 821 2008 10.1002/sres.904 Systems intelligence—the way forward? A note on Ackoff’s “why few organizations adopt systems thinking” Eur J Oper Res Hämäläinen 228 623 2013 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.001 On the importance of behavioral operational research: the case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems Hämäläinen 2014 Being better: living with systems intelligence 10.1109/TALE.2018.8615247 Hämäläinen RP, Saarinen E, Törmänen J (2018) Systems intelligence: a core competence for next-generation engineers? In: 2018 IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment, and learning for engineering (TALE). pp 641–644. 10.1109/tale.2018.8615247. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Sci Public Policy Heink 2015 10.1093/scipol/scu082 Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science-policy interfaces: challenges and opportunities 10.3920/978-90-8686-757-8_21 Helgeson J, van der Linden S, Chabay I (2012) "The role of knowledge, learning and mental models in public perceptions of climate change related risks. In: Wals A, Corcoran P (eds) Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Amsterdam Henrick EC, Cobb P, Penuel WR, et al (2017) Assessing research-practice partnerships: five dimensions of effectiveness. William T Grant Foundation. http://wtgrantfoundation.org/library/uploads/2017/10/Assessing-Research-Practice-Partnerships.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Holzner 2006 Transparency in global change: the vanguard of the open society Soc Nat Resour Horangic 29 1421 2016 10.1080/08941920.2016.1144837 Influences on stakeholder participation in water negotiations: a case study from the Klamath Basin Kahneman 2011 Thinking, fast and slow Kaner 2007 Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making Integr Environ Assess Manag Kiker 1 2 95 2005 10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1 Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making 10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3 Kilgour M, Eden C (eds) (2010) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, Berlin Kjaer 2010 Governance EURO J Decis Process Lienert 3 107 2015 10.1007/s40070-014-0030-0 Structured decision-making for sustainable water infrastructure planning and four future scenarios Linkov 2011 Multi-criteria decision analysis—environmental applications and case studies Sustainability (Switzerland) Lopez 11 1 2019 A transdisciplinary approach to identifying transboundary tipping points in a contentious area: experiences from across the Jordan River region Lynch DD, Risley JC (2003) Klamath River basin hydrologic conditions prior to the September 2002 die-off of salmon and steelhead. Water Resour Investig Rep 03-4099. US Geological Survey Environ Syst Decis McKay 37 156 2017 10.1007/s10669-016-9611-8 Development and testing a diagnostic capacity tool for improving socio-ecological system governance 10.1007/s10669-019-09744-0 McKay PA, Olabisi LS, Vogt CA (2019) Assessing improvements in socio-ecological system governance using mixed methods, and the quality governance framework and its diagnostic capacity tool. Environ Syst Decis. 10.1007/s10669-019-09744-0 Meadows 2008 Thinking in systems: a primer J Land Use Sci Meyfroidt 8 341 2013 10.1080/1747423X.2012.667452 Environmental cognitions, land change, and social-ecological feedbacks: an overview National Research Council (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC 10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0005 O’Neill O (2006) Transparency and the ethics of communication. In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford Univ Press for the British Academy, Oxford, pp 75–90 Ecol Soc Partelow 23 4 36 2018 10.5751/ES-10594-230436 A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges Picard RW (1995) Affective computing. M.I.T Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report No. 321. https://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/95.picard.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Eur J Oper Res Pomerol 99 3 1997 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00378-5 Artificial intelligence and human decision making Post MA, Ward E, Longo NV, Saltmarsh J (eds) (2016) Publicly engaged scholars: next generation engagement and the future of higher education. Stylus Publishing, Sterling Water Res Prouty 137 107 2018 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.009 Socio-technical strategies and behavior change to increase the adoption and sustainability of wastewater resource recovery systems Ravetz 1996 Scientific knowledge and its social problems Restor Ecol Reed 26 S1 S7 2018 10.1111/rec.12541 A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Rhodes R (1999) Forward. In: Stoker G (ed) The new management of British local level governance. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, p xviii Policy Sci Rittel 4 155 1973 10.1007/BF01405730 Dilemmas in a general theory of planning 10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0007 Roberts A (2006) Dashed expectations: governmental adaptation to transparency rules. In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford Univ Press for the British Academy, Oxford, pp 107–126 10.1057/978-1-137-53551-1_7 Robertson DA (2016) Agent based models and behavioral operational research. In: Kunc M, Malpass J, White L (eds) Behavioral operational research. Springer, Berlin, pp 137–159 Sci Commun Roeser 41 2 274 2016 An emotional deliberation approach to risk Saltmarsh J, Hartley M (eds) (2012) To serve a larger purpose: engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education. Temple University Press, Philadelphia 10.1007/978-981-13-2327-0 Sato T, Chabay I, Helgeson J (eds) (2018) Transformations of social-ecological systems: studies in cocreating integrated knowledge toward sustainable futures. Springer, Singapore Schuman S (ed) (2005) The IAF handbook of group facilitation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0010 Stasavage D (2006) Does transparency make a different? The example of the European Council of Ministers. In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford Univ Press for the British Academy, Oxford, pp 165–179 Int J Sustain Dev Stöhr 17 403 2014 10.1504/IJSD.2014.065328 From shouting matches to productive dialogue—establishing stakeholder participation in Polish fisheries governance Susskind 1999 Negotiating environmental agreements Susskind 1999 The consensus building handbook: a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement Snyder R (2016) U.S. House oversight and government reform committee testimony. MLive. https://www.mlive.com/news/2016/03/read_gov_snyders_flint_water_c.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Environ Sci Policy Tàbara 28 71 2013 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.005 Coupling human information and knowledge systems with social-ecological systems change: reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability Sci Commun Todt 39 5 720 2014 Values and decisions: cognitive and noncognitive values in knowledge generation and decision making Earths Future Walker 6 757 2018 10.1002/2017EF000750 A response to Glynn et al. “From data to decisions: processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments” Wildavsky 1979 Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis