¹⁰ Be‐derived catchment average erosion rates from the Himalaya and Eastern Tibet show different relationships with normalized channel steepness index ( k _sn ), suggesting differences in erosional efficiency of bedrock river incision. We used a threshold stream power model (SPM) combined with a stochastic distribution of discharges to explore the extent to which this observation can be explained by differences in the mean and variability of discharge between the two regions. Based on the analysis of 199 daily discharge records (record lengths 3–45 years; average 18.5 years), we parameterized monsoonal discharge with a weighted sum of two inverse gamma distributions. During both high‐ and low‐flow conditions, annual and interannual discharge variabilities are similarly low in each region. Channel widths for 36 rivers indicate, on average, 25% wider streams in Eastern Tibet than in the Himalaya. Because most catchments with ¹⁰ Be data are not gauged, we constrained mean annual discharge in these catchments using gridded precipitation data sets that we calibrated to the available discharge records. Comparing ¹⁰ Be‐derived with modeled erosion rates, the stochastic‐threshold SPM explains regional differences better than a simple SPM based on drainage area or mean annual runoff. Systematic differences at small k _sn values can be reconciled with k _sn ‐dependent erosion thresholds, whereas substantial scatter for high k _sn values persists, likely due to methodological limitations. Sensitivity analysis of the stochastic‐threshold SPM calibrated to the Himalaya indicates that changes in the duration or strength of summer monsoon precipitation have the largest effect on erosional efficiency, while changes in monsoonal discharge variability have almost no effect. The modeling approach presented in this study can in principle be used to assess the impact of precipitation changes on erosion.

¹⁰ Be‐derived erosion rates from the Himalaya and Eastern Tibet indicate regional differences in erosional efficiency

River incision is the main process that erodes mountain belts such as the Himalaya or Tibet. Existing models of river incision emphasize the role of water discharge and river slopes. More recent research, however, emphasizes the role of discharge variability, i.e., how variable the streamflow of an individual river is over time. Theoretically, it is possible that rivers with less but more variable discharge are more erosive than rivers with more but less variable discharge. Despite growing understanding of the mechanics of river incision it has been difficult to test existing models of river incision with field data. In our study, we combine a state‐of‐the‐art model of river incision with a wealth of empirical data from the Himalaya and Eastern Tibet to test the importance of discharge variability and to assess whether observed differences in centennial to millennial erosion rates can be reconciled with our current understanding of the climatic and topographic controls on river incision. Results show that the importance of discharge variability in the Himalaya is much smaller than expected and plays a role only in gently‐sloping rivers. While observations can be reconciled with our model to some degree, remaining discrepancies highlight shortcomings of the model as well as the data used to constrain the model.